Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-11 23:50:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96A7948300CA48FD19C7B1BD1C023DB651C36C324DC080E1975E6CC38285EBAB
Participant Details

Original Note:

As críticas ao estado da liberdade de expressão no Brasil são sobre a aplicação, pelo STF, de censura prévia e outros tipos de censura, que são expressamente vedados pela nossa constituição, no Art. 220. § 2º. Não é sobre "ataques a outras pessoas ou a democracia". https://www.gov.br/mj/pt-br/assuntos/seus-direitos/classificacao-1/legislacao/constituicao.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889428750149841127
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96A7948300CA48FD19C7B1BD1C023DB651C36C324DC080E1975E6CC38285EBAB
  • createdAtMillis - 1739317801854
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188942875014984112796A7948300CA48FD19C7B1BD1C023DB651C36C324DC080E1975E6CC38285EBAB