Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-11 01:20:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7270DD26E1579459CFC20D352230DBFFFB5AC0121035303F46B07927BDA0AB1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article does not claim that the rock was fake. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/02/07/trump-moon-rock-oval-office-nasa/78328756007/ The sample has been analyzed, and it's a real moon rock. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/static/history/alsj/a17/A17-76015.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889031343272530374
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7270DD26E1579459CFC20D352230DBFFFB5AC0121035303F46B07927BDA0AB1
  • createdAtMillis - 1739236856502
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1889031343272530374E7270DD26E1579459CFC20D352230DBFFFB5AC0121035303F46B07927BDA0AB1