Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-10 11:52:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13F68AC984B68FA78605EDE4527923DD5E62F98BF6FF17003B419D5357926CE8
Participant Details

Original Note:

提示されている記事にある通り、乳腺外科医事件について、最高裁第二小法廷が、裁判官4人の全員一致で、東京高裁の有罪判決を破棄したことは事実であり、誤解を招いておらず、コミュニティノートは不要と言えます。 https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASQ2L6G04Q2LUTIL041.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888897428038000710
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13F68AC984B68FA78605EDE4527923DD5E62F98BF6FF17003B419D5357926CE8
  • createdAtMillis - 1739188372905
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188889742803800071013F68AC984B68FA78605EDE4527923DD5E62F98BF6FF17003B419D5357926CE8