Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 23:48:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B55E35E44BC12C4724A6351D67E565C62A5E514A4FDBFAE2D789E793C6D46DEC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sanidad presenta como hecho estadístico un artículo de opinión que no contiene un solo dato ni fuente científica. Incurre en falacias de explicación no contrastada, generalización abusiva, conclusión irrelevante, datos insuficientes, non sequitur, post hoc ergo propter hoc. https://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2014/12/doctrina37467.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888718751648161891
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B55E35E44BC12C4724A6351D67E565C62A5E514A4FDBFAE2D789E793C6D46DEC
  • createdAtMillis - 1739144892090
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888718751648161891B55E35E44BC12C4724A6351D67E565C62A5E514A4FDBFAE2D789E793C6D46DEC