Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-10 08:15:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B39A24395091F2B351B2914C6779B530B6401E75B8D5B538A2F37A9F74966A70
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sanidad presenta como hecho estadístico un artículo de opinión que no contiene un solo dato ni fuente científica. Incurre en falacias de explicación no contrastada, generalización abusiva, conclusión irrelevante, datos insuficientes, non sequitur, post hoc ergo propter hoc. https://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2014/12/doctrina37467.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888718751648161891
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B39A24395091F2B351B2914C6779B530B6401E75B8D5B538A2F37A9F74966A70
  • createdAtMillis - 1739175305149
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888718751648161891B39A24395091F2B351B2914C6779B530B6401E75B8D5B538A2F37A9F74966A70