Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-10 13:03:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E96CDFB3CE298B0682F39535E25F4EE1EAFB2D0588C3D9432244E19E0033E3E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sanidad presenta como hecho estadístico un artículo de opinión que no contiene un solo dato ni fuente científica. Incurre en falacias de explicación no contrastada, generalización abusiva, conclusión irrelevante, datos insuficientes, non sequitur, post hoc ergo propter hoc. https://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2014/12/doctrina37467.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888718751648161891
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E96CDFB3CE298B0682F39535E25F4EE1EAFB2D0588C3D9432244E19E0033E3E
  • createdAtMillis - 1739192598407
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18887187516481618913E96CDFB3CE298B0682F39535E25F4EE1EAFB2D0588C3D9432244E19E0033E3E