Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-10 11:50:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3BD2EA4F9BF2C7AE472A9A6A53BCFC29931BD3B7F3359E41E8EE10AE4E7C0A63
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sanidad presenta como hecho estadístico un artículo de opinión que no contiene un solo dato ni fuente científica. Incurre en falacias de explicación no contrastada, generalización abusiva, conclusión irrelevante, datos insuficientes, non sequitur, post hoc ergo propter hoc. https://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2014/12/doctrina37467.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888718751648161891
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3BD2EA4F9BF2C7AE472A9A6A53BCFC29931BD3B7F3359E41E8EE10AE4E7C0A63
  • createdAtMillis - 1739188232831
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18887187516481618913BD2EA4F9BF2C7AE472A9A6A53BCFC29931BD3B7F3359E41E8EE10AE4E7C0A63