Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 23:04:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 311F020DC46B35AE06044CE27918AB6C51113CE697EB77E81D351A3CBD260336
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sanidad presenta como hecho estadístico un artículo de opinión que no contiene un solo dato ni fuente científica. Incurre en falacias de explicación no contrastada, generalización abusiva, conclusión irrelevante, datos insuficientes, non sequitur, post hoc ergo propter hoc. https://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2014/12/doctrina37467.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888718751648161891
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 311F020DC46B35AE06044CE27918AB6C51113CE697EB77E81D351A3CBD260336
  • createdAtMillis - 1739142266061
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888718751648161891311F020DC46B35AE06044CE27918AB6C51113CE697EB77E81D351A3CBD260336