Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-11 11:49:58 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F5873CB046D10E6DB16A34AFD4BFC9993A2774659E85BC07FF4E948B95AC4A5F
Participant Details
Original Note:
VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp
All Note Details