Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-11 11:42:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F4FCCC9B0FB0E2952535C814DCB11F8D84E95D616F99CB10AE64FC09D715F535
Participant Details
Original Note:
VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp
All Note Details