Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-12-18 20:11:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D02CC9DDA8A5477E2EDFAE3483178674B2306EF86E8E2B18C528926AAC1EB4DC
Participant Details
Original Note:
VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp
All Note Details