Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-09 19:32:38 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B3E6BA2C3366D2969CD74F0753C480A97EA091B4D88D8173BDBE83C583FC6DE7
Participant Details
Original Note:
VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp
All Note Details