Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-10 23:23:50 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 901DAD41DBFEA24015A7F30C0A9645B246962B70DAF4677E3BE0CFE4D5C3BC71
Participant Details
Original Note:
VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp
All Note Details