Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-12-19 14:00:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 84419C72072B91FF664A40228F3B7821E094E6ADB8F3FA3B60FCFC510B29BB20
Participant Details
Original Note:
VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp
All Note Details