Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 23:30:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 793EEC9CCBFEEC56C363C1BDCBE74A50ADCB3E117BF6B28ED0480692B623B72E
Participant Details

Original Note:

VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888671257065078918
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 793EEC9CCBFEEC56C363C1BDCBE74A50ADCB3E117BF6B28ED0480692B623B72E
  • createdAtMillis - 1739143802971
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888671257065078918793EEC9CCBFEEC56C363C1BDCBE74A50ADCB3E117BF6B28ED0480692B623B72E