Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-10 01:40:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36580994992EC71BF6BA97A0C1B4083641426E8945C9C2B24A3CBEEEC64274D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888671257065078918
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36580994992EC71BF6BA97A0C1B4083641426E8945C9C2B24A3CBEEEC64274D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1739151632247
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 188867125706507891836580994992EC71BF6BA97A0C1B4083641426E8945C9C2B24A3CBEEEC64274D8