Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-10 18:50:48 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 296C901655F2AED6308F8AF1FEBE11F778895A62D77FC3F1D875220F75EC3D58
Participant Details
Original Note:
VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp
All Note Details