Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-10 17:59:07 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 264D1D9F77BD1F1BB770BEE0AA9B6CCA0193B918A319F9DB4E4DB3C0070D5ED7
Participant Details
Original Note:
VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp
All Note Details