Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-10 09:35:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 13DC437E1D28D949D579F092CAF7CAEEC80EF06B9DBF9379E931F70D708A79F3
Participant Details
Original Note:
VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp
All Note Details