Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 19:45:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E0CE21B28887A0F01D5D065855185ACE6526FE6EDD6689370F407161D376FF4
Participant Details

Original Note:

VP Vance’s suggestion to ignore a federal judge’s ruling is legally false & unconstitutional, because (1) the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI) makes rulings binding. (2) Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison) says courts have final authority. (3) Separation of Powers prevents this https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888671257065078918
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E0CE21B28887A0F01D5D065855185ACE6526FE6EDD6689370F407161D376FF4
  • createdAtMillis - 1739130317777
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18886712570650789180E0CE21B28887A0F01D5D065855185ACE6526FE6EDD6689370F407161D376FF4