Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-10 02:22:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A5A303D272B5DF8FB49D20E689A0E42DCA858056D92EB1E3A931BE9B38E287E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Cursory references to FRCP 65, the Winter factors, and the Administrative Procedure Act are lifted from the state plaintiffs‘ brief without further legal analysis by the judge. If you are not a lawyer, you should be careful when playing one in CNs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888611522865426833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A5A303D272B5DF8FB49D20E689A0E42DCA858056D92EB1E3A931BE9B38E287E
  • createdAtMillis - 1739154141553
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18886115228654268330A5A303D272B5DF8FB49D20E689A0E42DCA858056D92EB1E3A931BE9B38E287E