Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-05 23:36:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 42719328946E0677E382CBDF810B112D8CE22FB86028BD9B2B58613B71A375A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Prognos Umfragen ist kein seriƶses Institut. https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/hintergrund/2025/02/07/x-account-prognos-umfragen-verbreitet-seit-jahren-unserioese-wahlprojektionen/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888569001602580636
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 42719328946E0677E382CBDF810B112D8CE22FB86028BD9B2B58613B71A375A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1749166593113
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188856900160258063642719328946E0677E382CBDF810B112D8CE22FB86028BD9B2B58613B71A375A0