Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 16:50:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4566A1259200C383B5CE1EB31E33B92B48A6B9B8113C9234A5A4AB0AA5140FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge issued his ruling 'ex parte', which means the defendants 1. were not notified of the proceeding 2. were not allowed to be present 3. were not allowed to make any argument It is also highly unusual to prohibit federal officers from accessing their own agency's data.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888546127655453020
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4566A1259200C383B5CE1EB31E33B92B48A6B9B8113C9234A5A4AB0AA5140FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1739119847915
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888546127655453020C4566A1259200C383B5CE1EB31E33B92B48A6B9B8113C9234A5A4AB0AA5140FE