Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 13:36:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5B0EBF9BE46C04B743DD6A5D628403DC1FF24D408E95E06E72C52B6C12C12F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge issued his ruling 'ex parte', which means the defendants 1. were not notified of the proceeding 2. were not allowed to be present 3. were not allowed to make any argument It is also highly unusual to prohibit federal officers from accessing their own agency's data.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888546127655453020
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5B0EBF9BE46C04B743DD6A5D628403DC1FF24D408E95E06E72C52B6C12C12F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1739108166427
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888546127655453020A5B0EBF9BE46C04B743DD6A5D628403DC1FF24D408E95E06E72C52B6C12C12F3