Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-10 00:28:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 891833EE82FFD2D98F1E72196934398D048FD63E6FA36853B8C40052EFCD53A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge issued his ruling 'ex parte', which means the defendants 1. were not notified of the proceeding 2. were not allowed to be present 3. were not allowed to make any argument It is also highly unusual to prohibit federal officers from accessing their own agency's data.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888546127655453020
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 891833EE82FFD2D98F1E72196934398D048FD63E6FA36853B8C40052EFCD53A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1739147281312
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888546127655453020891833EE82FFD2D98F1E72196934398D048FD63E6FA36853B8C40052EFCD53A0