Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 15:21:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC1071DE271642F9BACDCDAD611F59FC37DE4B29FB2F3482E36F0592200A2C75
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not only is it an opinion being shared, but the tweet is stating that these specific actions, how revocation is being used, etc. are unprecedented, not that security clearance revocation itself is unprecedented.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888489880658792695
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC1071DE271642F9BACDCDAD611F59FC37DE4B29FB2F3482E36F0592200A2C75
  • createdAtMillis - 1739114487777
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888489880658792695EC1071DE271642F9BACDCDAD611F59FC37DE4B29FB2F3482E36F0592200A2C75