Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 09:40:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4EAFE650F35C78269F911AD7583B4D71FC20DB20314C506F44CBD73A982E1818
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not only is it an opinion being shared, but the tweet is stating that these specific actions, how revocation is being used, etc. are unprecedented, not that security clearance revocation itself is unprecedented.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888489880658792695
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4EAFE650F35C78269F911AD7583B4D71FC20DB20314C506F44CBD73A982E1818
  • createdAtMillis - 1739094018172
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18884898806587926954EAFE650F35C78269F911AD7583B4D71FC20DB20314C506F44CBD73A982E1818