Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 10:19:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 541CFDBFAA2B93BDAF1C0DB897E066D78B09F35271AA47B41F02F1A8A6BC9E45
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note might be needed, but it needs more than a "no evidence found" note. A CN here requires solid evidence that DOGE has not found any 150 year-olds who are receiving Social Security. Speculation and unfounded skepticism belong in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888479761170923799
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 541CFDBFAA2B93BDAF1C0DB897E066D78B09F35271AA47B41F02F1A8A6BC9E45
  • createdAtMillis - 1739096352381
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888479761170923799541CFDBFAA2B93BDAF1C0DB897E066D78B09F35271AA47B41F02F1A8A6BC9E45