Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-10 01:03:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E22F5EA54784F09852FF08295E4235FD27E2DB74884EA56BA9B9BEFC283085F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. Judge Paul Engelmayer cited specific laws. On page 1, the judge notes the states citing the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) of 1946. On page 2, the judge agreed with that argument. On page 3, the judge cited rule 65 of the federal rules of civil procedure. https://web.archive.org/web/20250208231709/https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/myvmbzdenpr/02082025doge_order.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20250204234349/https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/administrative_procedure_act https://web.archive.org/web/20250102021430/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_Procedure_Act

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888367964333760595
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E22F5EA54784F09852FF08295E4235FD27E2DB74884EA56BA9B9BEFC283085F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1739149383154
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888367964333760595E22F5EA54784F09852FF08295E4235FD27E2DB74884EA56BA9B9BEFC283085F7