Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 17:54:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71DA36677F372804CCE4325C3A29520E15829EDA5F36854FFDD3B9F8F489E083
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. Judge Paul Engelmayer cited specific laws. On page 1, the judge notes the states citing the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) of 1946. On page 2, the judge agreed with that argument. On page 3, the judge cited rule 65 of the federal rules of civil procedure. https://web.archive.org/web/20250208231709/https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/myvmbzdenpr/02082025doge_order.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20250204234349/https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/administrative_procedure_act https://web.archive.org/web/20250102021430/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_Procedure_Act

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888367964333760595
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71DA36677F372804CCE4325C3A29520E15829EDA5F36854FFDD3B9F8F489E083
  • createdAtMillis - 1739123641762
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 188836796433376059571DA36677F372804CCE4325C3A29520E15829EDA5F36854FFDD3B9F8F489E083