Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 03:43:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1AC71C3B1C6BA336355B32F4F6457CD371130795B2CCADC038586C29C48A492C
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. Judge Paul Engelmayer cited specific laws. On page 1, the judge notes the states citing the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) of 1946. On page 2, the judge agreed with that argument. On page 3, the judge cited rule 65 of the federal rules of civil procedure. https://web.archive.org/web/20250208231709/https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/myvmbzdenpr/02082025doge_order.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20250204234349/https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/administrative_procedure_act https://web.archive.org/web/20250102021430/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_Procedure_Act

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888367964333760595
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1AC71C3B1C6BA336355B32F4F6457CD371130795B2CCADC038586C29C48A492C
  • createdAtMillis - 1739072608123
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18883679643337605951AC71C3B1C6BA336355B32F4F6457CD371130795B2CCADC038586C29C48A492C