Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 00:17:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN 1) This judge has no authority whatsoever to adjudicate a hearing against the executive branch without there being anyone present on the defense 2) No violation of the Constitution has been cited, which is what the law would require to advance such a motion https://www.fjc.gov/history/administration/judicial-review-executive-orders https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.7-2/ALDE_00000031/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888356950032990480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D
  • createdAtMillis - 1739060241397
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888356950032990480F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D