Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-08 23:09:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1E82545D4C0A8908DB0FD314FF130F212322A55A9D24B18DA4A77B4AE6FEC81
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN 1) This judge has no authority whatsoever to adjudicate a hearing against the executive branch without there being anyone present on the defense 2) No violation of the Constitution has been cited, which is what the law would require to advance such a motion https://www.fjc.gov/history/administration/judicial-review-executive-orders https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.7-2/ALDE_00000031/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888356950032990480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1E82545D4C0A8908DB0FD314FF130F212322A55A9D24B18DA4A77B4AE6FEC81
  • createdAtMillis - 1739056148039
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888356950032990480C1E82545D4C0A8908DB0FD314FF130F212322A55A9D24B18DA4A77B4AE6FEC81