Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 16:29:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 77EA25C64059C74742D321932264CD8156B3005FA1BFEC66061B313018011FAA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN 1) This judge has no authority whatsoever to adjudicate a hearing against the executive branch without there being anyone present on the defense 2) No violation of the Constitution has been cited, which is what the law would require to advance such a motion https://www.fjc.gov/history/administration/judicial-review-executive-orders https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.7-2/ALDE_00000031/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888356950032990480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 77EA25C64059C74742D321932264CD8156B3005FA1BFEC66061B313018011FAA
  • createdAtMillis - 1739118574329
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188835695003299048077EA25C64059C74742D321932264CD8156B3005FA1BFEC66061B313018011FAA