Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 03:19:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5039E5D4D01F8DD2775843A645074DF5459E1C9C08248ACB782ACDB66D08D515
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN 1) This judge has no authority whatsoever to adjudicate a hearing against the executive branch without there being anyone present on the defense 2) No violation of the Constitution has been cited, which is what the law would require to advance such a motion https://www.fjc.gov/history/administration/judicial-review-executive-orders https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.7-2/ALDE_00000031/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888356950032990480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5039E5D4D01F8DD2775843A645074DF5459E1C9C08248ACB782ACDB66D08D515
  • createdAtMillis - 1739071189814
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18883569500329904805039E5D4D01F8DD2775843A645074DF5459E1C9C08248ACB782ACDB66D08D515