Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 07:20:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1122BB21042889FDFEA2911F4EA421FEF7C360BD4D63230C3329D6F437E3426
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The OP is clear that it is his opinion the judge's general citation of "irreparable harm" is not sufficient to constitute an appropriate, specific legal citation to justify the order. As such, this is a debate over judicial opinions, which belongs in responses, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888351885515718663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1122BB21042889FDFEA2911F4EA421FEF7C360BD4D63230C3329D6F437E3426
  • createdAtMillis - 1739085654546
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1888351885515718663C1122BB21042889FDFEA2911F4EA421FEF7C360BD4D63230C3329D6F437E3426