Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-08 20:30:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00CB71F8CD6D858E6F9D6F8E52C2D94B61078D4EF01E5D76E3297DFC8338678C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source in the note, while very very lengthy, makes zero effort to statistically substantiate their 2.5 million figure and on dozens of occasions makes wild unproven conclusions based on misinterpretation of third party sourced data.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888026539574300996
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00CB71F8CD6D858E6F9D6F8E52C2D94B61078D4EF01E5D76E3297DFC8338678C
  • createdAtMillis - 1739046644517
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188802653957430099600CB71F8CD6D858E6F9D6F8E52C2D94B61078D4EF01E5D76E3297DFC8338678C