Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-07 17:43:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D5C9560C840E140B9664BB9CE995FC1382114A3CC5B86F04E4E43175D0CCA6B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Current employment is not the crux of the claim. If USAID is merely a FORMER employer, it is still valid to question whether a conflict of interest exists. By journalistic standards, it does not change the core of the ethics in question. https://ethicsadvicelineforjournalists.org/2024/07/25/conflict-of-interest-revisited/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887891867498344642
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D5C9560C840E140B9664BB9CE995FC1382114A3CC5B86F04E4E43175D0CCA6B
  • createdAtMillis - 1738950213993
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18878918674983446420D5C9560C840E140B9664BB9CE995FC1382114A3CC5B86F04E4E43175D0CCA6B