Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-07 14:08:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39EF93BEAF565D5F37C221BB37482F7CE3AD4E2D7C9DDFEE24AF31760D6CAA7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - it’s her opinion. Opinions do not need community notes. As for the CN saying it’s a statement of fact, the source you use is two years out-of-date, and regardless, it implies a majority do not find the BBC trustworthy.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887783198060409110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39EF93BEAF565D5F37C221BB37482F7CE3AD4E2D7C9DDFEE24AF31760D6CAA7E
  • createdAtMillis - 1738937328954
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188778319806040911039EF93BEAF565D5F37C221BB37482F7CE3AD4E2D7C9DDFEE24AF31760D6CAA7E