Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-07 01:54:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 299879A5622067CE40CEA7EC9889ED89E5B54483D9338422FBEF788D3547988C
Participant Details

Original Note:

 まずこの事件においては地裁での判決すら降りておらず、事実ではない可能性が十分にあります。  なおかつ本件においては真反対の供述が被告人質問によって行われていることを考えれば投稿者及びリンク元の偏向報道であるという可能性に注意が必要です。 https://news.livedoor.com/lite/article_detail/28090613/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887647506303156377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 299879A5622067CE40CEA7EC9889ED89E5B54483D9338422FBEF788D3547988C
  • createdAtMillis - 1738893279699
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1887647506303156377299879A5622067CE40CEA7EC9889ED89E5B54483D9338422FBEF788D3547988C