Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-06 22:09:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9BFA4F7C05C4FE2CAEDEB1951A1C09A882513ADFD8D4D57F6D2E3DB39E96E74A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes quoting Wikipedia should be discounted or ignored as there is now proof of bias in their information and the way they treat subjects.https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/3308849/wikipedia-blacklists-conservative-sources-favor-left-wing-bias/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887612664798716217
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9BFA4F7C05C4FE2CAEDEB1951A1C09A882513ADFD8D4D57F6D2E3DB39E96E74A
  • createdAtMillis - 1738879784054
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18876126647987162179BFA4F7C05C4FE2CAEDEB1951A1C09A882513ADFD8D4D57F6D2E3DB39E96E74A