Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-06 16:10:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A037AD238740F2DA83B44F88C23D39D66C3E5E107C2922AFAC429C4E828C710F
Participant Details

Original Note:

It would beg the question that if the BBC was not being funded by USAID, then why are they claiming to be impacted by a freeze to USAID funding? Clearly, something is not correct about the proposed note. We are finding out new information every day. NNN, use the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887523657070637144
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A037AD238740F2DA83B44F88C23D39D66C3E5E107C2922AFAC429C4E828C710F
  • createdAtMillis - 1738858225568
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1887523657070637144A037AD238740F2DA83B44F88C23D39D66C3E5E107C2922AFAC429C4E828C710F