Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-07 08:32:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C00ED699CC908CBC23C0C5E643F6FC67A031516E78D335D2F9E6BB89E292502
Participant Details

Original Note:

It would beg the question that if the BBC was not being funded by USAID, then why are they claiming to be impacted by a freeze to USAID funding? Clearly, something is not correct about the proposed note. We are finding out new information every day. NNN, use the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887523657070637144
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C00ED699CC908CBC23C0C5E643F6FC67A031516E78D335D2F9E6BB89E292502
  • createdAtMillis - 1738917146631
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18875236570706371448C00ED699CC908CBC23C0C5E643F6FC67A031516E78D335D2F9E6BB89E292502