Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-06 18:39:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C63A88C318E7C2AD3B405899218F098A9A45EE5C36174A7064FD456751745296
Participant Details

Original Note:

incorreto, a nota não embasa o post que está se referindo a decisão recente do SFT feita nesta segunda feira (04/01) a respeito de não haver injúria racial contra pessoas brancas https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2025/04022025-Racismo-reverso-STJ-afasta-injuria-racial-contra-pessoa-branca-em-razao-da-cor-da-pele.aspx

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887466731523784841
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C63A88C318E7C2AD3B405899218F098A9A45EE5C36174A7064FD456751745296
  • createdAtMillis - 1738867175211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1887466731523784841C63A88C318E7C2AD3B405899218F098A9A45EE5C36174A7064FD456751745296