Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-06 12:30:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4613CCB866B50D18D714718CF2D35EA6A64E94BF80D6949A6775458F1A1F2940
Participant Details

Original Note:

incorreto, a nota não embasa o post que está se referindo a decisão recente do SFT feita nesta segunda feira (04/01) a respeito de não haver injúria racial contra pessoas brancas https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2025/04022025-Racismo-reverso-STJ-afasta-injuria-racial-contra-pessoa-branca-em-razao-da-cor-da-pele.aspx

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887466731523784841
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4613CCB866B50D18D714718CF2D35EA6A64E94BF80D6949A6775458F1A1F2940
  • createdAtMillis - 1738845036469
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18874667315237848414613CCB866B50D18D714718CF2D35EA6A64E94BF80D6949A6775458F1A1F2940