Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-06 21:19:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E79104414BE4545FCA9AAED2504C17D6DE0B64D6EC9481B294508F7D9317F0E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rachida Dati a dit exactement l’opposé pour expliquer cette éviction. Les propos sont faux. Voir lien : https://x.com/publicsenat/status/1887166010735644865?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887457011907863000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E79104414BE4545FCA9AAED2504C17D6DE0B64D6EC9481B294508F7D9317F0E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1738876781120
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1887457011907863000E79104414BE4545FCA9AAED2504C17D6DE0B64D6EC9481B294508F7D9317F0E6