Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-06 10:25:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 386B99E5D39AC21FC24B02AA8FC45918C3F33660AE45A4DCDA2BA1155251C65F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Irreführend Was Frau Schröder hier absichtlich verschweigt, ist die Tatsache, dass es sich um einen Entschließungsantrag handelt, der rechtlich keine Bindung hat. Es wurde kein Gesetz verabschiedet, dass Frau Faeser beachten muss. https://www.bundestag.de/services/glossar/glossar/E/entschl_antrag-245394 https://x.com/djpr/status/1885081704169119825?t=RtOsZR7oBcGVVrv3AbesSQ&s=19 https://www.bundestag.de/parlament/plenum/abstimmung/abstimmung?id=940

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887435130949521541
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 386B99E5D39AC21FC24B02AA8FC45918C3F33660AE45A4DCDA2BA1155251C65F
  • createdAtMillis - 1738837527735
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1887435130949521541386B99E5D39AC21FC24B02AA8FC45918C3F33660AE45A4DCDA2BA1155251C65F