Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-06 18:59:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 56E34046850408D2C81B6D64F00EAEA9FC28C4B16D3B4517325059E72BE578C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

É necessário acrescentar contexto às alegações do Excelentíssimo Ministro. Apesar de afirmar que a Corte não é ativista, em diversas ocasiões ela se comportou como tal, ainda que sob o pretexto de defender a "democracia" ou de fazer a coisa certa. Conforme fontes: https://www.scielo.br/j/rinc/a/DjrnzM9pSSFBFLr6vNRBZrM/ https://www.conjur.com.br/2024-jan-10/ativismo-judicial-como-o-stf-salvou-a-democracia-em-2022/ https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2023/09/13/plinio-critica-ativismo-judicial-do-stf-nas-atribuicoes-do-congresso-nacional https://www.poder360.com.br/justica/nos-derrotamos-o-bolsonarismo-diz-barroso-na-une/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887246598310121982
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 56E34046850408D2C81B6D64F00EAEA9FC28C4B16D3B4517325059E72BE578C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1738868353514
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188724659831012198256E34046850408D2C81B6D64F00EAEA9FC28C4B16D3B4517325059E72BE578C2