Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-05 20:41:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85279E7194ABC953646E6825DCC093D702C350514FF3F1A8505BA8F17E6C4FB7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the context provided is irrelevant. Also, we can’t use the Times as a reliable source anymore, generally, but especially not in this context where the discussion about the ways in which the Times allowed itself to be ideologically compromised, for money.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887204479474569511
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85279E7194ABC953646E6825DCC093D702C350514FF3F1A8505BA8F17E6C4FB7
  • createdAtMillis - 1738788080143
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188720447947456951185279E7194ABC953646E6825DCC093D702C350514FF3F1A8505BA8F17E6C4FB7