Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-06 11:06:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7BF5BC672146F0B8CCD762940454BE4A1FD3CACEEA4F46146E24EE047C3B1C06
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the context provided is irrelevant. Also, we can’t use the Times as a reliable source anymore, generally, but especially not in this context where the discussion about the ways in which the Times allowed itself to be ideologically compromised, for money.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1887204479474569511
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7BF5BC672146F0B8CCD762940454BE4A1FD3CACEEA4F46146E24EE047C3B1C06
  • createdAtMillis - 1738839997112
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18872044794745695117BF5BC672146F0B8CCD762940454BE4A1FD3CACEEA4F46146E24EE047C3B1C06